![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Old Timer
|
I'm partial to superchargers, but a turbo is not evil in my eyes. They all have their uses and I like road course racing, where low end torque is invaluable.
__________________
There's no better feeling than seeing something you made work 1998 Honda Civic EX (D16Y8) N/A 1985 Toyota Celica GT (7MGTE) SOLD 1991 Nissan 240SX (S13 Coupe) Sold to fund other projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Guru
|
I agree with Doja, i would rebuild the entire motor just to be safe. Because, keep in mind that there will still be 10-13 year old stock parts that may not be able to handle the increased boost or simply the spool up of a turbo. Plus, even if you were to get a turbo that would give you decent amount of boost (let us say 9+ psi) an intercooler, oil line, and several other parts would be necessary to keep all the parts cool while the turbo operates. A friend once said to me "put a turbo in your car, some magic happens, and it goes faster." That my friend is complete and total bullshit ;P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Old Timer
|
Automatics tend to upshift so low in the power band that the turbo only ever spools in the last gear and overdrive usually doesn't spool the turbo either.
So imagine driving around like your turbo is waaay and never spools up. The other danger is that turbos tend to give a jolt of power which is detrimental to the health of an automatic.
__________________
There's no better feeling than seeing something you made work 1998 Honda Civic EX (D16Y8) N/A 1985 Toyota Celica GT (7MGTE) SOLD 1991 Nissan 240SX (S13 Coupe) Sold to fund other projects
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|